e-mail to my dad

I've noticed with both Byron Katie, and Nome, and maybe readingTalks with Ramana Maharshi, there is a tedency for them to alwaysbe a step ahead of the questioner. Because they aren't in the self-referentialzone. So Byron Katie for instance, or Barack Obama they respond, as if theyknew what the questioner was going to say before they say it, so thereresponses are always prescient (for instancecould Barack Obama lose a debate? I would say, it's probably impossible). Maybe that is because the strange attractoris always ahead of the attempt to codify it. The questioner who is not inharmony or orbiting the strange attractor, because of all these self-codifiednotions tries to codify the response, but the strange attractor which is generating both the questions and the answers, the answer from the Jnaniis always in perfect harmony with the question, which surprises the questioner,who goes away rightly convinced of the omnipotence of the person they asked the question,which is really the strange attractor acting through the Jnani.Thus the intelligently placed reverence toward a Jesus, or a Buddha. Because if you wantto orbit the strange attractor of harmony, and happiness, who do you go to?Your next door neighbor, Rush Limbaugh. No, they can't help, they are as out of sortsas I am. I go to a Nome, or a Maharshi, or a Byron Katie, or a Barack Obama,or read the Ribhu Gita, to help me be in harmony with the strange attractor.